Frustrations
1.
dumb_soprano and I got up to watch Hamilton's untimely exit.
2. I've been snot-filled with various colds for a couple of weeks now and I'm absolutely FED UP with it! I want to be healthy!!! (This is a relative term, naturally ...!)
3. Special Church Meeting yesterday was largely positive, particularly as regards finances and our ongoing Regeneration project. We've been offered a large interest-free loan to help us finance the next phase of our development, which is wonderful news. However, one item in particular really frustrated me.
We want to restructure the way in which the church is led/run/some less authoritarian term. The ministers and current Diaconate have been looking into this for at least the past year, reviewing and refining suggestions to put to the Church meeting. Not suggestions for a permanent, set in stone restructuring, but to trial a new system which we believe would mean people had a chance to serve God according to their talents and the needs of the church, rather than the current system which verges on "Oh, nobody else can be bothered, the deacons will do it," at times. Of course, as soon as we put it to the church meeting (with them having had the proposals in advance) as strongly recommended by the current Diaconate, about half the members decide what this church really needs is more time to think about it before even trialling a new system!
This begs one particular question: if the current leadership/dogsbody system is so great, why are people rejecting their suggestions?!
Rant over for now, I promise. But feel free to carry it on in the comments :)
2. I've been snot-filled with various colds for a couple of weeks now and I'm absolutely FED UP with it! I want to be healthy!!! (This is a relative term, naturally ...!)
3. Special Church Meeting yesterday was largely positive, particularly as regards finances and our ongoing Regeneration project. We've been offered a large interest-free loan to help us finance the next phase of our development, which is wonderful news. However, one item in particular really frustrated me.
We want to restructure the way in which the church is led/run/some less authoritarian term. The ministers and current Diaconate have been looking into this for at least the past year, reviewing and refining suggestions to put to the Church meeting. Not suggestions for a permanent, set in stone restructuring, but to trial a new system which we believe would mean people had a chance to serve God according to their talents and the needs of the church, rather than the current system which verges on "Oh, nobody else can be bothered, the deacons will do it," at times. Of course, as soon as we put it to the church meeting (with them having had the proposals in advance) as strongly recommended by the current Diaconate, about half the members decide what this church really needs is more time to think about it before even trialling a new system!
This begs one particular question: if the current leadership/dogsbody system is so great, why are people rejecting their suggestions?!
Rant over for now, I promise. But feel free to carry it on in the comments :)


